Product suite

One workspace for cleaner permit packets.

Six product surfaces, one permit dossier. PlanSift prepares every packet before review and keeps human reviewers in control.

PlanSift workspace with readiness score, AI issue detection and document checklist.
Suite map

Six surfaces. One permit dossier.

Every PlanSift feature reads from the same packet, so applicants and reviewers never argue about the truth of a project.

Packet Intelligence

Every form, plan sheet and zoning note in a single living dossier.

Issue Detection

AI flags missing documents, mismatched fields and code conflicts.

Readiness Score

A 0–100% snapshot of how close a packet is to clean submission.

Corrections Translator

Turn cryptic correction notes into a plain-English fix list.

Reviewer Workspace

City reviewers see findings, source citations and decisions in one view.

Analytics

See where permits stall, why, and how to fix the queue.

Product tour

From upload to audit-ready packet.

Tap a step to see what PlanSift does at each stage.

Run a precheck before you submit

Upload a packet. PlanSift extracts forms, plan sheets and zoning notes, then runs the checklist for the target jurisdiction.

  • Document inventory
  • Form mismatch flags
  • Plan-sheet review
  • Zoning quick-check
PRECHECK · LIVEPlanSift

Readiness

82%of packet is clean
Lot coveragePass
Missing dimension on A-202Warn
Setback conflict — north lineIssue
AI issue detection

See problems before a reviewer has to.

Each finding ships with severity, the sheet and detail it lives on, and a citation to the underlying code or rule.

  • Setback conflict — north property line

    Sheet A-101 · Detail 3 · Zoning §17.20.040

    Issue
  • Missing dimension on rear elevation

    Sheet A-202 · Building Code Ch. 4

    Warn
  • Owner name mismatch across forms

    Form B-1 vs. Form C-2

    Warn
  • Lot coverage within allowed range

    Verified · Zoning §17.20.080

    Pass
Floor plan blueprint annotated by PlanSift with a red dashed setback conflict box and amber circle for a missing dimension.
Human-led review

AI moves the work faster. People stay in control.

PlanSift is decision support, not decision making. Every recommendation is auditable; every approval comes from a human reviewer.

  1. Step 01

    AI prepares

    The packet is parsed, scored and annotated with cited findings.

  2. Step 02

    Humans review

    Reviewers triage, override, escalate, or accept each finding.

  3. Step 03

    Authority decides

    The relevant authority issues the final permit decision.

Customer proof

Tier 1 Residential REIT, Southwest US.

A residential real estate investment trust operating 14,000+ units across Arizona, Nevada, and Texas. Project managers, regional facilities directors, and third-party permit expediters use PlanSift for pre-submission verification of exterior renovation packets.

Before

22%

Return to Applicant rate, driven by missing signatures and version mismatches in site plans. Completeness was confirmed by manual PDF cross-referencing and expediter email chains.

After

4%

Return to Applicant rate, with reduced submission-to-review lag. Operating window March 2025 – present, measured from an internal Monday.com project tracking log and municipal portal timestamps.

Source records

  • Site plans
  • Zoning variance letters
  • Municipal correction notes from prior rounds
  • Application metadata
“We were losing two weeks per project on simple administrative omissions. Moving the precheck to a source-linked system stopped the back-and-forth with the city.”
Marcus Vane, VP of Capital Improvements — Tier 1 Residential REIT, Southwest US

Workflow story · Correction note resolution for mixed-use development

A commercial/residential mixed-use project in Phoenix, AZ received a 14-item correction list from the city; three items contradicted previous approval letters. Reading the municipal correction notice PDF, original site plan v2.1, and the prior approval letter dated October 2024, PlanSift identified a version mismatch between the submitted site plan and the referenced approval letter, raising Correction Risk flags on Item #4 and Item #7 with a recommended update of the site plan to v2.3 to align with the previously granted variance. The architect reviewed the discrepancy and uploaded the correct drawing version; the packet was resubmitted and approved without further corrections, avoiding an estimated three-week delay in groundbreaking. Measured via project timeline tracking and published as an anonymized technical artifact.

AI-assisted. Source-linked. Human-led. PlanSift prepares readiness signals for human review. Licensed professionals and official reviewers make final determinations. PlanSift does not approve permits, certify code compliance, or issue official zoning determinations.

Get started

Stop submitting packets that come back red.

Run a precheck in minutes. Catch issues before they cost weeks.